https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149953
--- Comment #5 from Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> --- (In reply to blinxen from comment #4) > Taking this review > > Some comments / issues with the package: > > - The upstream project does not include a license file in `Cargo.toml`. I > can see that you add it manually but it would be nice if you could push the > change to upstream. Maybe by specifying `license-file` [1]?. No. The `license-file` field in Cargo.toml is supposed to only be used if the license is non-standard (i.e. custom license with no corresponding SPDX identifier). > - The license path for the `devel` package is wrong. It should be `%license > %{crate_instdir}/LICENSE`. That *would* be true, but the upstream Cargo.toml specifies files to include, and `LICENSE` is not among the listed files. So it cannot be referenced this way unless the `include` setting in Cargo.toml is also fixed to include the "LICENSE" file. Otherwise it will not get copied to %{crate_instdir}. > - `rust2rpm` always adds the `%doc` directive to `devel` packages. I am not > sure if this is actually required as I couldn't find anything about it in > the guidelines but I think adding it shouldn't hurt. Something like `%doc > %{crate_instdir}/README.md` Yes, this line seems to be missing from the -devel subpackage's files: %doc %{crate_instdir}/README.md -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149953 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
