On 16.09.2014 10:31, Sihan Goi wrote:
Figured out the problem - the firewall rules are somehow not persistent.
After running the following commands:

iptables -I INPUT -m state --state NEW -p udp -m multiport --dports
5404,5405 -j ACCEPT
iptables -I INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 2224 -j ACCEPT
iptables -I INPUT -p igmp -j ACCEPT
iptables -I INPUT -m addrtype --dst-type MULTICAST -j ACCEPT
service iptables save

Both nodes are able to communicate with each other.

Seems like several things aren't persistent upon reboots, and need to be
restarted/reconfigured. Is this the intended behavior?

What do you mean with "several things" ? Firewall/iptables on CentOS 7? Or 
Pacemaker/Corosync/pcs ?


Nikita

On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Nikita Michalko <michalko.sys...@a-i-p.com>
wrote:

  Hi,

maybe is following helpfull:
https://www.google.at/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CDEQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fhttpd.apache.org%2Fdocs%2Ftrunk%2Fbind.html&ei=QV0FVK2YBYHO0QXPxYHQDw&usg=AFQjCNGCErofEEVtclS_x6ZXA3bXvJiaww&sig2=hR8kUWRcpmN4PE1V42t9kg&bvm=bv.74115972,d.bGE
https://www.google.at/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CC0QrAIwAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fubuntuforums.org%2Fshowthread.php%3Ft%3D1636667&ei=QV0FVK2YBYHO0QXPxYHQDw&usg=AFQjCNHcs7alJ_RwBc4tWq2X7ew4ynEmzg&sig2=ra1qjZ8nly8opwawrACidw&bvm=bv.74115972,d.bGE


HTH

Nikita



On 02.09.2014 07:47, Sihan Goi wrote:

Hi,

After some investigation, it seems that my Apache is having trouble
starting in both nodes. I get the following error message when I try to
restart the service:

Job for httpd.service failed. See 'systemctl status httpd.service' and
'journalctl -xn' for details.

"systemctl status httpd.service" shows the following output:

httpd.service - The Apache HTTP Server
    Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/httpd.service; enabled)
    Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Tue 2014-09-02 13:45:52 SGT; 8s
ago
   Process: 26095 ExecStop=/bin/kill -WINCH ${MAINPID} (code=exited,
status=0/SUCCESS)
   Process: 26093 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/httpd $OPTIONS -DFOREGROUND
(code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)
  Main PID: 26093 (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)

Sep 02 13:45:52 node02 httpd[26093]: AH00558: httpd: Could not reliably
det...ge
Sep 02 13:45:52 node02 httpd[26093]: (98)Address already in use: AH00072:
m...80
Sep 02 13:45:52 node02 httpd[26093]: no listening sockets available,
shutti...wn
Sep 02 13:45:52 node02 httpd[26093]: AH00015: Unable to open logs
Sep 02 13:45:52 node02 systemd[1]: httpd.service: main process exited,
code...RE
Sep 02 13:45:52 node02 systemd[1]: Failed to start The Apache HTTP Server.
Sep 02 13:45:52 node02 systemd[1]: Unit httpd.service entered failed state.
Hint: Some lines were ellipsized, use -l to show in full.

/var/log/messages also shows similar messages

Sep  2 13:41:12 node02 systemd: Starting The Apache HTTP Server...
Sep  2 13:41:12 node02 httpd: AH00558: httpd: Could not reliably determine
the server's fully qualified domain name, using 192.168.0.112. Set the
'ServerName' directive globally to suppress this message
Sep  2 13:41:12 node02 httpd: (98)Address already in use: AH00072:
make_sock: could not bind to address 127.0.0.1:80
Sep  2 13:41:12 node02 httpd: no listening sockets available, shutting down
Sep  2 13:41:12 node02 httpd: AH00015: Unable to open logs
Sep  2 13:41:12 node02 systemd: httpd.service: main process exited,
code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
Sep  2 13:41:12 node02 systemd: Failed to start The Apache HTTP Server.
Sep  2 13:41:12 node02 systemd: Unit httpd.service entered failed state.

Is this related to the problem?



On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Teerapatr Kittiratanachai 
<maillist...@gmail.com> wrote:


  Try to set cidr_netmask=32 for resource only, and let the physical
interface's netmask be 24.

On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Sihan Goi <gois...@gmail.com> 
<gois...@gmail.com> wrote:

  Got it. Changed the netmask for both PCs to 255.255.255.0 and changed
cidr_netmask to 24 and it works...sort of.

It was working for a while, and then I rebooted both PCs, and now each
thinks its online and the other is offline.

"pcs status" on my node01 gives the following output:
Cluster name: cluster_web
Last updated: Tue Sep  2 12:21:25 2014
Last change: Tue Sep  2 12:13:27 2014 via cibadmin on node02
Stack: corosync
Current DC: node01 (1) - partition WITHOUT quorum
Version: 1.1.10-32.el7_0-368c726
2 Nodes configured
2 Resources configured


Online: [ node01 ]
OFFLINE: [ node02 ]

Full list of resources:

  virtual_ip    (ocf::heartbeat:IPaddr2):    Started node01
  webserver    (ocf::heartbeat:apache):    Started node01

PCSD Status:
   node01: Offline
   node02: Online

Daemon Status:
   corosync: active/disabled
   pacemaker: active/disabled
   pcsd: active/disabled

However, "pcs status" on node02 shows the following output:
Cluster name: cluster_web
Last updated: Tue Sep  2 12:20:41 2014
Last change: Tue Sep  2 11:59:03 2014 via cibadmin on node02
Stack: corosync
Current DC: node02 (2) - partition WITHOUT quorum
Version: 1.1.10-32.el7_0-368c726
2 Nodes configured
2 Resources configured


Online: [ node02 ]
OFFLINE: [ node01 ]

Full list of resources:

  virtual_ip    (ocf::heartbeat:IPaddr2):    Started node02
  webserver    (ocf::heartbeat:apache):    Started node02

PCSD Status:
   node01: Offline
   node02: Online

Daemon Status:
   corosync: active/disabled
   pacemaker: active/disabled
   pcsd: active/disabled

Seems like each node thinks it's online and the other is not. I'm

  running HA

  on apache webserver, and if I access the webpage on node01, I get

  node01's

  index.html. If I access it on node02, I get node02's index.html. If I

  access

  it via another PC connected to the same AP, the webpage is unavailable.

What could be wrong?


On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 9:09 PM, John Lauro <john.la...@covenanteyes.com> 
<john.la...@covenanteyes.com>
wrote:

  ip=192.168.0.110 cidr_netmask=32
/32 leaves no room for any other IP addresses on that interface and so

  you

  have to specify the nic.  Are you certain 192.168.0.111 and

  192.168.0.112 do

  not have a different netmask from 255.255.255.255, like 255.255.255.0

  for

  /24 or 255.255.0.0 for /16?  If they do have 255.255.255.255 too, then

  they

  are probably not setup correctly...

PS: cidr_netmask is optional.  Assuming a proper netmask (not
255.255.255.2555) is on 192.168.0.111 and 192.168.0.112 it should work
without specifying cidr_netmask.


________________________________

From: "Sihan Goi" <gois...@gmail.com> <gois...@gmail.com>
To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Sent: Monday, September 1, 2014 4:17:20 AM
Subject: [Pacemaker] ERROR: Unable to find nic or netmask.


Hi,

I'm trying to create a HA cluster with 2 CentOS 7 PCs connected to a
wireless AP. The PCs have the static IP addresses 192.168.0.111 and
192.168.0.112 respectively and hostnames node01 and node02 respectively.

I've tried to create a virtual IP address of 192.168.0.110 using the
following command:

pcs resource create virtual_ip ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr2 ip=192.168.0.110
cidr_netmask=32 op monitor interval=30s

However, when I do a "pcs status resources" I get the following output:

  virtual_ip    (ocf::heartbeat:IPaddr2):    Stopped

The virtual IP is stopped rather than started. I looked into
/var/log/messages and /var/log/pacemaker.log
  and I find the following error messages:

node02 IPaddr2(virtual_ip)[25451]: ERROR: Unable to find nic or netmask.
node02 IPaddr2(virtual_ip)[25451]: ERROR: [findif] failed

It seems that it's unable to find my nic. How can I fix this?

Thanks.

_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: 
Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.orghttp://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started:

  http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf

  Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org



--
- Goi sihangois...@gmail.com

_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: 
Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.orghttp://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

  _______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: 
Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.orghttp://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org




_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: 
Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.orghttp://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org



_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org





_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Reply via email to