On 10 Sep 2014, at 3:56 am, David Vossel <dvos...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > ----- Original Message ----- >> Is it possible to put a location constraint on a resource such that it will >> only run on a pacemaker-remote node? Or vice-versa, so that a resource will >> not run on a pacemaker-remote node? >> >> At a glance, this doesn't seem possible as the pacemaker-remote node does not >> exist as a <node> entry in the CIB, so there's nothing to match on. Is it >> possible to match on the absence of that <node> entry? >> >> The only other way I can think of doing this is to set utilization >> attributes, such that the remote nodes provide a "remote" utilization >> attribute, and configure the resource such that it needs 1 unit of "remote". > > There is definitely a way to do this already. I can't remember how though. > > Andrew, I know we discussed this a few months ago and you immediately rattled > off how we allow this. Do you remember? #kind eq (container|cluster) > > -- Vossel > > > > >> -Patrick >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org >> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker >> >> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org >> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf >> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
