Hello all, We're in the process of implementing geo-redundancy on SLES 11 SP3 (version 0.1.0). We are seeing behavior in which site 2 in a geo-cluster decides that the ticket has expired long before actual expiry. Here's an example time-line:
1 - All sites (site 1, site 2 and arbitrator) agree on ticket owner and expiry. i.e. site 2 has the ticket with a 60-second expiry: Aug 25 10:07:10 linux-4i31 booth-arbitrator: [22526]: info: command: 'crm_ticket -t geo-ticket -S expires -v 1408975690' was executed Aug 25 10:07:10 bb5Btas0 booth-site: [27782]: info: command: 'crm_ticket -t geo-ticket -S expires -v 1408975690' was executed Aug 25 10:07:10 bb5Atas1 booth-site: [7826]: info: command: 'crm_ticket -t geo-ticket -S expires -v 1408975690' was executed 2 - After 48 seconds (80% into lease), all three nodes are still in agreement: Site 2: Aug 25 10:07:58 bb5Btas0 booth-site: [27782]: info: command: 'crm_ticket -t geo-ticket -S owner -v 2' was executed Aug 25 10:07:58 bb5Btas0 booth-site: [27782]: info: command: 'crm_ticket -t geo-ticket -S expires -v 1408975738' was executed The arbitrator: Aug 25 10:07:58 linux-4i31 crm_ticket[23836]: notice: crm_log_args: Invoked: crm_ticket -t geo-ticket -S owner -v 2 Aug 25 10:07:58 linux-4i31 booth-arbitrator: [22526]: info: command: 'crm_ticket -t geo-ticket -S expires -v 1408975738' was executed Site 1: Aug 25 10:07:58 bb5Atas1 booth-site: [7826]: info: command: 'crm_ticket -t geo-ticket -S owner -v 2' was executed Aug 25 10:07:58 bb5Atas1 booth-site: [7826]: info: command: 'crm_ticket -t geo-ticket -S expires -v 1408975738' was executed 3 - Site 2 decides that the ticket has expired (at the expiry time set in step 1) Aug 25 10:08:10 bb5Btas0 booth-site: [27782]: debug: lease expires ... 4 - At 10:08:58, both site 1 and the arbitrator expire the lease and pick a new master. I presume that there was some missed communication between site 2 and the rest of the geo-cluster. There is nothing in the logs to help debug this, though. Any hints on debugging this? BTW: we only ever see this on a site 2 - never a site 1. This is consistent across several labs. Is there a bias towards site 1? Thanks in advance, Rob
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
