----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Vossel" <dvos...@redhat.com> > To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager" <pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org> > Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 10:39:22 AM > Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Best practice for quorum nodes > > Is there a better way to designate a node as a quorum node, so that > > resources > > do not attempt to start or re-start on it? Perhaps a combination of setting > > it in "standby" mode and a resource constraint to prevent the resources > > from > > running on it? Or, is there a better way to set it up? > > Pacemaker is going to probe the node for active resources regardless. If you > don't want to see these errors, make sure the resource-agents and > resource-agent dependent packages are installed on all nodes in the cluster. > > -- Vossel >
David, Thanks for the clarification. Andrew _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org