----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Vossel" <dvos...@redhat.com>
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager" <pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org>
> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 10:39:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Best practice for quorum nodes
> > Is there a better way to designate a node as a quorum node, so that
> > resources
> > do not attempt to start or re-start on it? Perhaps a combination of setting
> > it in "standby" mode and a resource constraint to prevent the resources
> > from
> > running on it? Or, is there a better way to set it up?
> 
> Pacemaker is going to probe the node for active resources regardless. If you
> don't want to see these errors, make sure the resource-agents and
> resource-agent dependent packages are installed on all nodes in the cluster.
> 
> -- Vossel
> 

David,

Thanks for the clarification.

Andrew

_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Reply via email to