On Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:13:13 +0100 Vladimir <m...@foomx.de> wrote: > Actually I have no concrete reasons to switch to pcs. I had no > problems with crmsh and was pretty happy with it. I'm just curious > how it will continue with crmsh under debian. pcs seems to become a > little more common, at least on clusterlabs documentation. Sometimes > also customers ask for it because they think pcs is crmsh's successor.
Yeah, that seems to be a common misconception. To be fair, on Red Hat-based platforms that is the case (at least if you want support from RH). On the clusterlabs web site there's documentation using both pcs and crmsh, and if there's anything missing in the crmsh documentation there I'll try to get it fixed. I don't know exactly what the state of things are on Debian right now, but last time I checked crmsh was still the shell of choice there. crmsh is still alive! :) -- // Kristoffer Grönlund // kgronl...@suse.com _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
