On 2013-12-13T10:16:41, Kristoffer Grönlund <kgronl...@suse.com> wrote:
> Lars (lmb) suggested that we might switch to using the { } - brackets
> around resource sets everywhere for consistency. My only concern with
> that would be that it would be a breaking change to the previous crmsh
> syntax. Maybe that is okay when going from 1.x to 2.0, but it also
> makes me a bit nervous. :)
Yes, but consistency and syntax cleanups are important for 2.0.
Also, then we may finally be able to change the order for collocation
constraints as well ;-)
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB
21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
