shouldn't the delay's be different to avoid a stonith-battle? yes, in redhat cluster it was like that
2013/12/8 Masopust, Christian <[email protected]> > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Digimer [mailto:[email protected]] > > Gesendet: Freitag, 06. Dezember 2013 17:20 > > An: [email protected]; The Pacemaker cluster resource manager > > Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] configuration of stonith > > > > > > If you're using 1.1.10+, > > > > pcs stonith create fence_pcmk1_ipmi fence_ipmilan \ > > pcmk_host_list="pcmk-1" ipaddr="pcmk-1.ipmi" \ > > action="reboot" login="admin" passwd="secret" delay=15 \ > > op monitor interval=60s > > > > pcs stonith create fence_pcmk2_ipmi fence_ipmilan \ > > pcmk_host_list="pcmk-2" ipaddr="pcmk-2.ipmi" \ > > action="reboot" login="admin" passwd="secret" delay=15 \ > > op monitor interval=60s > > > > is sufficient. > > > > Hi, > > just two questions about setting these stonith: > > - shouldn't the delay's be different to avoid a stonith-battle? > > - when creating these stonith I see them both started on one single > node. Don't I need some location constraints? Such that "fence_pcmk1" > only runs on pcmk2 and vice versa? > > Thanks, > christian > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: [email protected] > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org > -- esta es mi vida e me la vivo hasta que dios quiera
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: [email protected] http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
