On 2013-10-15T18:24:46, Kazunori INOUE <kazunori.ino...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oct 15 15:17:16 vm2 stonith-ng[9160]: warning: log_operation: f1:9273
> [ Performing: stonith -t external/libvirt -T reset vm3 ]
> Oct 15 15:17:46 vm2 stonith-ng[9160]: warning: log_operation: f1:9588
> [ Performing: stonith -t external/libvirt -T reset vm3 ]
>
> Is it specifications?
Apparently, yes.
The "stonith resource" no longer signifies the node which will perform
the fence request, just the node where the monitor for the STONITH
device will be run.
I have opinions on this change (I liked the old behaviour much better),
but it's apparently intentional.
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB
21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
