On 11/09/2013, at 5:54 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree <l...@suse.com> wrote:

> On 2013-04-02T17:02:01, David Vossel <dvos...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> I'm convinced this useful.
>> 
>> I'll add PCMK_MAX_CHILDREN to the sysconfig documentation.  To be backwards 
>> compatible I'll have the lrmd internally interpret your LRMD_MAX_CHILDREN 
>> environment variable as well.
>> 
>> sound reasonable?
> 
> Hi David,
> 
> sorry for being thick, but I can't find this in the code now. Did this
> slip through again in April?

Apparently. But before we add it, I'd like to see if we can do something 
coherent.
Having 3 (or more) different variables (batch-limit, migration-limit and this) 
for controlling these things doesn't seem optimal or user friendly.

If anything, we should likely be putting work into auto-tuning this stuff 
instead.  Somehow.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Reply via email to