On 07/01/2013 08:19 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >> Well its possible right now, it "just" not super pretty to configure. > I already set "Important" IMAP flag on that message and really willing > to copy that into my internal wiki ;)
This might be of use (note that I wrote it, not Andrew, so blame me for mistakes/typos). http://clusterlabs.org/wiki/Fencing_topology Also note that I will test without location constraints tomorrow and update the wiki to remove those steps. Feedback would be much appreciated. >> > You should be able to leave out the location constraints though, that >> > reduces the size a lot. > Yep, that requires a bit of thinking still. > >> > >> > And if people start using it, then we might look at simplifying it. > May be it's worth to have anonymous poll at clusterlabs.org for that? It would be a skewed result. How many rhcs users even realize yet that a change to pacemaker is coming? How many who might use this won't have a reason to visit clusterlabs.org during the time the poll is up? -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
