On 2013-06-28T11:20:32, Digimer <li...@alteeve.ca> wrote:
> Yes, a failed "on" action would then fail the method. This is
> sub-optimal as FenceAgentAPI says that only the "off" portion of
> "reboot" needs to succeed. However, I don't consider this a show stopper
> because "on" action of PDUs simply means "re-energize the outlet". If
> the node blew up, it won't boot, but the "on" will still succeed, so the
> overall method would succeed.
Wait. If the "failed on" would fail this method, the fence will still be
considered "failed", right? Hence the cluster would block?
> Again though, with all this said, I will be happy with just keeping this
> existing functionality. It works.
Sure, given enough thrust, pigs achieve amazing things ;-)
> In fact, I'll write 'fence_apc_multi' as a proof of concept. Give me the
> weekend to do this.
But why? Why not spend that time on fixing it properly, if you're going
to fix it? It's a horrible hack!
I'll shut up now.
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB
21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
