Hello everyone!

I would like to ask a few questions about the main road of the cluster stack evolution.

1) The RedHat company is planning to drop corosync support and wants to switch to CMAN. ( http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/pacemaker/84662 )

What do you think the main trend is? What is the most popular and better supported solution? Corosync, CMAN or something else? What cluster engine is better for Pacemaker at the moment? And what could be the best solution in 2-3 years?

2) What is the best tool for cluster management: crm, pcs or something else?

Redhat switches to pcs and drops crm, but SUSE prefers crmsh tool.

Why? What tool will you advice to use?

3) What version of pacemaker should I prefer for using on RedHat 6.3 (or 6.4) ?

The version from the vendor (Pacemaker 1.1.7 for RedHat 6.3 and Pacemaker 1.1.8 for RedHat 6.4) or the upstream version from Github?

I usually prefer software versions coming from the distribution, because I hope they are well-tested and supported by the vendor. But, as I know, Pacemaker is a teсhnology preview in RedHat 6, so they don't response for it stability. Also, all the same, I have to rebuild Redhat src.rpm package ( for adding corosync 2.3 support into pacemaker)


With best regards,
Ivan Khalezov

_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Reply via email to