24.05.2013, 01:39, "Andrew Beekhof" <and...@beekhof.net>:
> On 24/05/2013, at 3:49 AM, Andrey Groshev <gre...@yandex.ru> wrote:
>
>>  23.05.2013, 02:51, "Andrew Beekhof" <and...@beekhof.net>:
>>>  On 22/05/2013, at 10:25 PM, Groshev Andrey <gre...@yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>>   Hello,
>>>>
>>>>   I try build cluster with 2 nodes + one quorum node (without pacemaker).
>>>  This is the root of your problem.
>>>
>>>  Your config has:
>>>>   service {
>>>>           name: pacemaker
>>>>           ver: 1
>>>>   }
>>  Well, I tested and "service version 0" and CMAN
>
> Do not do this.  If you want to use CMAN, remove the service {} block 
> completely.

Of course , I tested their separately.
But not fully tested "service version 0".
I repeated the test today - his behavior too as same "version 1".
Maybe the problem described in the official documentation?

>>  - it work.
>>  But I did not find in the documentation description of this option,
>>  although it was nearly six months each weekday reread "cluster from 
>> scratch" and other documens. :)
>>  Where can I find this documentation?
>>
>>  I was still the next question - about hangs elections.
>>  But I read your blog entirely ...
>>  That is, If plugins are buggy and no one to repair them will not, then have 
>> three choices:
>>  1. use service version of "0"
>
> This is still the plugin
>
>>  2. use CMAN
>>  3. Use corosync 2.x.
>>  I understood you correctly?
>>>  So even though you thought you only started corosync, you also started 
>>> part of pacemaker.
>>>  Specifically the part of pacemaker that gets loaded into corosync to 
>>> provides membership and _quorum_ APIs to the other daemons.
>>>
>>>  The output from corosync-quorumtool is completely irrelevant to pacemaker 
>>> in this kind of setup.
>>>
>>>  Since you're on a RHEL derivative, I highly suggest using Pacemaker with 
>>> CMAN (and updating to 6.4 while you're there :-).
>>>  In this case, the pacemaker daemons DO see the same quorum as 
>>> corosync-quorumtool and your expectations would be correct.
>>>  snip .....
>>  Unfortunately (or fortunately) I try not to focus on one specific 
>> distribution.
>>  I have to work with CentOS, and with many other Linux distributions.
>>  I am interested in your opinion, what will happen to the clusters in 
>> openSUSE?
>>
>>  Regards Andrey Groshev.
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
>>  http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>
>>  Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>>  Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>>  Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Reply via email to