On 21/05/2013, at 1:39 AM, Andrew Widdersheim <awiddersh...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Have I just run into a shortcoming with pacemaker? Short answer: yes but there is a work-around Basically attrd should be but is not truly atomic. Despite its best efforts, updates can still arrive at sufficiently different times to produce the behavior you saw. > Should I file a bug or RFE somewhere? Seems like there should be another > parameter when setting up a pingd resource to tell the DC/policy engine to > wait x amount of seconds so that all nodes have shared their connection state > before it makes a decision about moving resources. That would be: crmd-transition-delay = time [0s] *** Advanced Use Only *** Enabling this option will slow down cluster recovery under all conditions Delay cluster recovery for the configured interval to allow for additional/related events to occur. Useful if your configuration is sensitive to the order in which ping updates arrive. from "man crmd" :) For some reason its not in pacemaker-explained, I'll fix that now. _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org