On 2013-05-07T10:43:55, emmanuel segura <emi2f...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Andrea
>
> i think you need to think about that Lars told you = (Upgrade to SP2) or
> maybe you can try to use a diferent lun for the sbd and use ionice for
> setting the realtime class for sbd process
SBD is already using ionice etc internally.
There have been a number of improvements to how slow/hung IO is handled,
aborted, and retried - teaching me a number of lessons about the
ugliness of Unix IO calls that I could have done without ;-). The best
way to get a more robust sbd - in addition to having multiple devices -
is to upgrade.
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB
21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
