On 19/04/2013, at 7:37 PM, T. <nos...@godawa.de> wrote: > Hi Chris, > >> No, you're definitely not missing anything. The 'pcs cluster cib' >> output isn't pretty. > why there is an approach to build a new config-tool at all? > > Why not use the crmsh? Why it was dropped in the RHEL-build?
Because the author wanted it removed from Pacemaker, at which point someone would have needed to navigate the red tape to get it back into the distribution. This is something anyone can do for Fedora, but despite a lot of hollering, it appears no-one has had sufficient motivation. > Does it have some relevant disadvantages? Yes, see the original announcement thread. > -- > To Answer please replace "invalid" with "de" ! > Zum Antworten bitte "invalid" durch "de" ersetzen ! > > > Chau y hasta luego, > > Thorolf > > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
