On 2013-03-21T15:28:17, Leon Fauster <leonfaus...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > I believe the preferred pacemaker based HA configuration in RHEL 6.4 uses
> > all three packages and the preferred configuration in SLES11 SP2 is just
> > corosync/pacemaker (I do not believe CMAN is even available in SLE-HAE).
> > Why the different approaches and what is the advantage of each
> > configuration?
> cman is part of the RH cluster suite - the motivations of the different ha
> approaches for
> both vendors are for sure more based in strategic/marketing needs.
There's also a technical point of cman/pacemaker not being available
when SLE HA 11 was created, and it's not possible to do a rolling
upgrade to this configuration. Hence, cman will not appear in SLE HA
11.
If there is a technical benefit to the approach, we will reevaluate this
for SLE HA 12.
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB
21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
