Hi Jiaju, I try fixing this issue by reverting a commit. What do you think about it? https://github.com/jjzhang/booth/pull/48
Sincerely, Yuichi 2013/1/11 Yuichi SEINO <seino.clust...@gmail.com>: > Hi Jiaju, > > 2013/1/11 Jiaju Zhang <jjzh...@suse.de>: >> Hi Yuichi, >> >> On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 19:39 +0900, Yuichi SEINO wrote: >>> Hi Jiaju, >>> >>> I have a suggestion about this issue. Could you revert the following commit? >>> https://github.com/jjzhang/booth/commit/4b00d46480f45a205f2550ff0760c8b372009f7f >>> >>> Because the suitable log can't be output, we took in this fix. Even If >>> this commit is reverted, the behavior of booth should not be affect. >>> And, this issue is more important than this commit. >> >> The main reason we took that fix is to make the initialization to be >> under the protection of lockfile(), so that there are no two booth >> instances trying to start on the same node. > > Originally, there was lockfile check after setup_listener(). So, I > think that two booth instances can't start. However, booth usually > stop at the instant of setup_transport() before lockfile check because > booth uses the same IP. Therefore, the suitable log could not be > output. > In my opinion, Reverting this commit is simpler than making the new > function to initialize cib. > > Sincerely, > Yuichi > -- Yuichi SEINO METROSYSTEMS CORPORATION E-mail:seino.clust...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
