So we use old version of pacemaker? What version should we update to?
On 01/04/2013 11:57 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Michal Fiala <fi...@mfiala.net> wrote:
>> Hallo,
>>
>> thanks for information. We are using corosync-1.4.4 and
>> pacemaker-1.1.6.1.
>
> Oh, thats the old lrmd. In which case your original assessment could
> well be correct.
>
>> Pacemaker is started as a modul by corosync.
>>
>> corosync loggin option:
>>
>> logging {
>> fileline: off
>> to_stderr: no
>> to_logfile: no
>> logfile: /var/log/corosync.log
>> to_syslog: yes
>> syslog_facility: local0
>> debug: on
>> timestamp: on
>> logger_subsys {
>> subsys: AMF
>> debug: off
>> }
>> }
>>
>> and syslog is loging all levels of local0:
>>
>> local0.* -/var/log/corosync.log
>>
>> This this setting correct?
>>
>> Because with this setup, we do not have stderr from ocf linbit/drbd in
>> corosync.log.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Michal
>>
>> On 01/02/2013 01:00 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Michal Fiala <fi...@mfiala.net> wrote:
>>>> Hallo,
>>>>
>>>> we use corosyng logging via syslog (to_logfile: no; to_syslog: yes;
>>>> syslog_facility: local0; debug: on). Some OCF scripts do not use OCF API
>>>> to execute commands. I mean function ocf_run, which capture STDOUT and
>>>> STDERR. For example linbit/drbd uses its own function to execute
>>>> do_cmd(), which does not capture STDERR. So you can not see STDERR
>>>> output in corosync log file.
>>>> I have discuss this problem on drbd-user mailing list and they mean,
>>>> that capturing STDERR should be done by lrmd.
>>>>
>>>> Communication from drbd-user mailing list:
>>>>
>>>> Q: Is there a way how to capture stderr from
>>>> /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/linbit/drbd? I can simply patch ocf script, or
>>>> better this could be a global, permanent fix from developers.
>>>>
>>>> A: We deliberately chose to do it this way.
>>>> Besides the drbd.ocf predates ocf_run(), I think,
>>>> and is supposed to also work on clusters not providing this.
>>>>
>>>> The cluster-glue lrmd used to capture both stdout and stderr,
>>>> and logged it accordingly.
>>>>
>>>> The pacemaker 1.1.8 rewritten-from-scratch lrmd
>>>> apparently does not (yet).
>>>
>>> Not true. It is both captured and logged. The severity depends on a
>>> number of factors.
>>> So you might need to enable debug to get stderr from actions that didn't
>>> "fail".
>>>
>>>>
>>>> If you "fix" our do_cmd() in the way you propose to,
>>>> you'll break the drbd ocf resource agent,
>>>> because we use it in nested ways: X=$(do_cmd something else),
>>>> and expect *exactly* the stdout of somthing else there.
>>>>
>>>> So don't do that.
>>>>
>>>> If anything, this needs to be fixed in the rewritten-from-scratch
>>>> pacemaker lrmd.
>>>>
>>>> details see:
>>>> http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/2012-December/019416.html
>>>>
>>>> How can I solve capturing STDERR?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Michal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
>>>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>>>
>>>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>>>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>>>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
>>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>>
>>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>>>
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
