On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov <bub...@hoster-ok.com> wrote: > 04.01.2013 06:07, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov >> <bub...@hoster-ok.com> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'd like to share my successful attempt to confine pacemaker. >>> >>> I took pacemaker module barebone found in latest fedora's selinux-policy >>> (3.11.1-64.fc18) and >>> extended it a bit, so now I have pacemaker and some pacemaker-managed >>> services >>> running confined. >> >> Sweet. I've passed your amendments on to Milos who is looking after >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801493 > > I've extended it a bit more to run stonithd in fenced_t domain, so now > everything I can imagine runs fine (verified on two clusters, including > one with libvirt/qemu virtualization).
Nice work :) > Where is the best place to follow up with that? Probably the redhat bug. _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
