----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andrew Beekhof" <and...@beekhof.net> > To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager" <pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org> > Sent: Friday, December 7, 2012 2:45:56 PM > Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] pcmk 1.1.8, some issues > > > On 08/12/2012, at 3:45 AM, David Vossel <dvos...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: laurent+pacema...@u-picardie.fr > >> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager" > >> <pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org> > >> Sent: Friday, December 7, 2012 10:13:59 AM > >> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] pcmk 1.1.8, some issues > >> > >> David Vossel <dvos...@redhat.com> writes: > >> > >>> ----- Original Message ----- > >>>> From: laurent+pacema...@u-picardie.fr > >>>> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > >>>> Sent: Friday, December 7, 2012 9:48:12 AM > >>>> Subject: [Pacemaker] pcmk 1.1.8, some issues > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> I quite like 1.1.8 but I have some issues with it. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 1) something wrong with stonith-timeout > >>>> > >>>> stonith-ng[24816]: error: get_capable_devices: > >>>> stonith-timeout > >>>> duration 0 is too low, raise the duration to 80 seconds > >>>> > >>>> with <nvpair id="cib-bootstrap-options-stonith-timeout" > >>>> name="stonith-timeout" value="120s" /> > >>> > >>> When do you see this? Is pacemaker fencing a node when this > >>> occurs, or are you manually doing it using stonith_admin? > >> > >> oh sorry i forgot to say. > >> triggering it by stonith_admin -l nodename > > > > Yeah, looking at the code that should still work. Can you file a > > bug at bugs.clusterlabs.org in the fencing section for this. I'll > > have a look when I get a chance. > > stonith_admin probably isn't passing a timeout in.
It should be. If no timeout is given I believe it is hard-coded to default to 120 seconds. -- Vossel > > > > -- Vossel > > > >> I need to reinstall 1.1.8 on this test setup, i'm pretty sure the > >> fencing was also failing for no apparent reason. > >> But that's something to be expected with a timeout that low. > >> > >> -- > >> Laurent > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > >> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > >> > >> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > >> Getting started: > >> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > >> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > > Getting started: > > http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: > http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org > _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
