On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree <l...@suse.com> wrote: > On 2012-12-06T12:39:02, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: > >> > [1] and it'd perhaps even be cleaner if, indeed, we had resource sets >> > instead of groups, and could reference them as aggregates as well. But >> > that may be a different discussion. >> >> I would very much like to ditch groups for sets, but there are still some >> things I just can't get to work without the group pseudo resource. > > What if the id of a resource set could be used as a reference in other > constraints? > > The resource set would then implicitly become said "pseudo object".
The only way to do that properly is to create a fake resource that represents the set (basically make colocation sets more like groups, not the other way around). Which we will probably have to do anyway to get require-all=false to work for colocation. For ordering it was easy, we just create some fake actions that only show up in the graph. But colocation operates on resources, which would show up in the status :-/ _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
