Hi Jiaju, I understand the answer. Thank you.
Sincerely, Yuichi > > Oh, if you have powered off all the nodes in Site A, it can explain why > there is no the information on CIB in bug#5082 ;) > > Site A can join the booth cluster, given that the catch-up has been > finished. Since Site A was recovered within the expire date, so no other > site try to acquire the ticket for the time being, so Site A may get the > ticket via the voting again. > > I understand your question, if Site A can still keep the original ticket > but not go into the next round voting, that would be much better than > current behavior. It needs site A to analyze all the information that > just caught up, to determine if that ticket really belongs to himself or > not. This feature is in my todo list, I'm planning to refactor the > catch-up code, together with some refactoring of the transport layer in > the next development. > > Thanks, > Jiaju > -- Yuichi SEINO METROSYSTEMS CORPORATION E-mail:seino.clust...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
