On 06/21/2012 11:30 PM, David Vossel wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Phil Frost" <p...@macprofessionals.com>
>> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 4:25:53 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] resources not migrating when some are not runnable 
>> on one node, maybe because of groups or
>> master/slave clones?
>>
>> On 06/19/2012 04:31 PM, David Vossel wrote:
>>> Can you attach a crm_report of what happens when you put the two
>>> nodes in standby please?  Being able to see the xml and how the
>>> policy engine evaluates the transitions is helpful.
>>
>> The resulting reports were a bit big for the list, so I put them in a
>> bug report:
>>
>> https://developerbugs.linuxfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2652
> 
> We're reporting pacemaker issues to bugs.clusterlabs.org now.
> 
> I took a look at the cib in case2 and saw this in the status for storage02.
> 
>       <transient_attributes id="storage02">
>         <instance_attributes id="status-storage02">
>           <nvpair id="status-storage02-probe_complete" name="probe_complete" 
> value="true"/>
>           <nvpair id="status-storage02-master-drbd_nfsexports.1" 
> name="master-drbd_nfsexports:1" value="10"/>
>         </instance_attributes>
>       </transient_attributes>
> 
> storage02 will not give up the drbd master since it has a higher score that 
> storage01.  This coupled with the colocation rule between test and the drbd 
> master, and the location rule to never run "test" on storage02 cause the 
> "test" resource to never run.... "test" has to run with the drbd master, and 
> the drbd master is stuck because of the transient attributes on a node "test" 
> can't run on, so "test" can't start.
> 
> I don't understand why the transient attribute is there, or where it came 
> from yet.

This is added by the RA with the crm_master command. For example the
drbd RA chooses this value from the current state of drbd to let
Pacemaker promote best candidate.

Regards,
Andreas

> 
> 
> -- Vossel
> 
> 
>> I've also found a similar discussion in the archives, though I didn't
>> find much help in it:
>>
>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-November/008189.html
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>
>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>> Getting started:
>> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
> 



-- 
Need help with Pacemaker?
http://www.hastexo.com/now


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Reply via email to