On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Jake Smith <jsm...@argotec.com> wrote: > I ran into that (scheduler change) also after upgrading. I only accidentally > stumbled onto that fact. I wish Ubuntu had made it a little clearer that not > having a separate server kernel had more implications than just kernel!
It's correct that the default I/O scheduler was one of the things where an Ubuntu "server" kernel would differ from a "desktop" kernel. However, it's prudent in a system with a reasonably high-performance I/O subsystem (whether that box is being used for DRBD or not) to always set the scheduler to deadline either in your /etc/sysfs.conf (as Ubuntu has been shipping with sysfsutils for a while, albeit in universe) or in your bootloader configuration. Cheers, Florian -- Need help with High Availability? http://www.hastexo.com/now _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
