On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree <l...@suse.com> wrote: > On 2012-06-05T09:43:09, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: > >> Every argument made so far applies equally to HAWK and the Linbit GUI, >> yet there was no outcry when they were announced. > > No, like I said above, that did suck - but the architecture truly is > different and drbd-mc just wasn't the right answer for customers who > wanted a HTML-only frontend. Besides, this is not an outcry. An outcry > is revoking people's mailing list privileges and posting angry blogs. > ;-)
Ok, I see the point of both sides, so I will not join the outcry. :) Just for the record, the drbd mc / lcmc as an applet and a little bit backend could look like a web application, only better. Rasto -- Dipl.-Ing. Rastislav Levrinc rasto.levr...@gmail.com Linux Cluster Management Console http://lcmc.sf.net/ _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
