Florian Haas wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Christoph Bartoschek > <po...@pontohonk.de> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> we currently have the problem that when the NFS server is highly used the >> heartbeat:exportfs monitor script fails with a timeout because it cannot >> write the rmtab to the exported filesystem within the given time. > > So, how about increasing the timeout?
Yes. That is what we have done. But increasing the timeout to 180s seems a little bit excessive to me. >> My question is now. Is it necessary to synchronize rmtab? Shouldn't the >> clients just reconnect after a timeout? > > Synchronizing the rmtab is meant for the clients being able to > reconnect correctly after NFS _failover_, not just a brief network > hiccup between the NFS client and server. I am aware of this. But I wonder whether synchronizing the rmtab will only shorten the reconnect time for the NFS clients after a failover or whether it is necessary for the reconnect? Christoph _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
