On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Trevor Hemsley <thems...@voiceflex.com> wrote: > On 15/05/12 05:24, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 4:48 AM, Larry Brigman <larry.brig...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: >>>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 6:43 AM, Larry Brigman <larry.brig...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> I must be coming to the party late. I just noticed that 1.1.7 version >>>>> of pacemaker is out. >>>>> We are running 1.1.5 on centos5 and would like to upgrade to 1.1.7 but I >>>>> am not finding the rpm. >>>>> >>>>> Is that not getting built and pushed to rpm-next/epel5 tree any more? >>>>> Is there plans to do build it? >>>> I believe glib on epel5 is too old to build 1.1.7 there. >>>> Is there something preventing you from using a rhel-6 derivative? >>> Existing applications, tools and libraries that have not been tested on >>> RHEL-6, >>> plus multiple systems needing to be upgraded to RHEL-6 from RHEL-5 that >>> has yet to be tested. >> Ok. >> >> If there is sufficient interest (as gauged by >> http://beekhof.polldaddy.com/s/rhel-versions ), I will re-activate the >> epel-5 repo and include a more recent version of glib2. >> Please get the word out :-) > > Wouldn't it be better to fix the code to not use this function rather > than update a core el5 package? > >
No. The function has value, otherwise it wouldn't have been added to GLib nor would we be using it. Preventing progress in an upstream project because someone, somewhere, is running a VAX isn't a tenable position. _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
