Andrew, In our team, couple of years back, we tried to setup 2 nodes Active/Passive HA using pacemaker-1.0.5 and heartbeat-3.0.0
Now, I need to resume that work. First thing I thought I will update the libraries. Looks like I need to replace heartbeat with corosync. When I looked at the following links in clusterlabs.org site, to my knowledge the recent version available for pacemaker is 1.1.7 http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/ http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/Get_Pacemaker And based the corosync.org site, the latest version is 2.0.0 http://www.corosync.org/doku.php?id=releases If there are more recent and stable versions available that you can suggest, please let me know. If I have updates for RHEL 5.7, will I be able to build it myself? Thanks, Raffi > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net] > Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 7:19 AM > To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager > Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Corosync vs Heartbeat > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 7:56 PM, S, MOHAMED (MOHAMED)** CTR ** > <mohame...@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > If I want to try Pacemaker 1.1.7 and Corosync 2.0 in RHEL 5.0, > > > > Where can I find the set of rpms? > > You'd have to build them yourself. > And submit a patch to get it to build there at all I think (because > glib is so old). > > Why not use something a little more recent? > > > I could not find it in the following location > > http://www.clusterlabs.org/rpm-next/epel-5/x86_64/ > > > > Thanks, > > Raffi > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: S, MOHAMED (MOHAMED)** CTR ** > >> Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2012 1:16 PM > >> To: 'Digimer'; The Pacemaker cluster resource manager > >> Subject: RE: [Pacemaker] Corosync vs Heartbeat > >> > >> Digimer, > >> > >> Thanks for your advise. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Raffi > >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: Digimer [mailto:li...@alteeve.ca] > >> > Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 5:32 PM > >> > To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager > >> > Cc: S, MOHAMED (MOHAMED)** CTR ** > >> > Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Corosync vs Heartbeat > >> > > >> > On 04/13/2012 07:35 AM, S, MOHAMED (MOHAMED)** CTR ** wrote: > >> > > Hi, > >> > > > >> > > Which combination is good for a 2 node Active - Passive > configuration? > >> > > > >> > > Pacemaker + Corosync > >> > > > >> > > or > >> > > > >> > > Pacemaker + heartbeat > >> > > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > Raffi > >> > > >> > Heartbeat is deprecated and no longer developed (though it is > maintained > >> > by Linbit). It is strongly advised that you use corosync. > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Digimer > >> > Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
