On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Gao,Yan <y...@suse.com> wrote: > On 03/27/12 10:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Jiaju Zhang <jjzh...@suse.de> wrote: >>> On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 11:50 +0900, Yuichi Seino wrote: >>>> Hi Jiaju, >>>> >>>> I have a question about booth. >>>> I would like to know if a redundant structure of arbitrator is possible. >>>> If it is possible, Please tell me how to the approach. >>> >>> If I understand the question correctly, you mean that the arbitrator >>> should be redundant in case it might be down. Well, this can be resolved >>> by adding more arbitrators, for example, you have 2 sites, and configure >>> 3 arbitrators. >> >> The arbitrator is already redundant isn't it? >> Because you need a cluster node to fail before an arbitrator failure >> has any ill-effect. > I think the term "arbitrator" that Jiaju referred to is the booth daemon > running on a single machine, which is added to make sure the amount of > booth daemons are uneven number.
Right, but making it redundant is only useful if it and one of the real sites is already down. If you've lost two sites (real + tie-breaker), you already have bigger issues than validating the sites are really gone and manually granting a ticket. > > Regards, > Gao,Yan > -- > Gao,Yan <y...@suse.com> > Software Engineer > China Server Team, SUSE. > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
