On 23.02.2012 00:10, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > Do you still have LSB scripts on a machine thats using upstart?
Yes, some LSB scripts can't be easily converted to upstart jobs. Or, let's rephrase that - can't be converted to upstart jobs without losing some of the functionality. > On fedora they purged them all. All? Even the stuff like drbd? I have to take a look at that. > At any rate, I'm inclined to think that we're making an unnecessary > differentiation. > When we write LSB, we really mean "system services" and don't much > care if that means a SYS-V script, Upstart job or Systemd unit. I agree. > It also makes running mixed clusters needlessly painful. But then again, distributions have different names for the same service. For example, apache2 on debian/ubuntu, httpd on (all?) RPM distributions. > Should we not treat LSB (or some new name) as an alias for whatever > flavour of init is currently in vogue for that distro? > Doesn't seem like it would be terribly hard to work out on the fly. Therefore the question about initctl few days ago? :) I do like the idea. Some distributions provide multiple different init systems; switching between those would be much easier in that case. Best regards _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
