> Well I'm not sure I would be able to do that change. Failover is relatively easy to do but I really have no idea how to do the failback part.
>And that's exactly the reason why I haven't implemented it yet. With the current way how replication is done in PostgreSQL there is no easy way to switch between roles, or at least I don't know about a such way. Implementing just fail-over functionality by creating a trigger file on a slave server in the case of failure on master side doesn't create a full master-slave implementation in my opinion. We have created just such a multi-state RA, which incorporates a design to manage failover, failback, and fallback (regular backups). Please give us a few days - a member of my team is removing any product-specifics from it, and we'll post it shortly. Brett _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
