On 2011-10-12 19:36, Yves Trudeau wrote: > Hi Florian, > I pushed the latest code to LP, the agent use notification now.
Better. > Also, > most of the start/stop of resource have been removed. "Most of" is really not good enough here -- that thing still does all sorts of things modifying other resources, and I think we all agree that that's a big no-no. The monitor function is also still misguided. > In my opinion, > the existing agent would need a major rewrite to support the required > logic. I don't recall this RA being discussed on this list prior to today, or any of the authors getting involved in a discussion on the existing mysql RA. I may have missed something though; did I? If so, please point me to a link from the list archives and I'll be happy to educate myself on the discussion and whatever pros and cons were raised therein. > I think indeed it will a good idea to sit and talk at PLUK > about it. Yes, let's do that. > Maybe Pacemaker cannot be used but that would be sad. I strongly doubt that it can't. Cheers, Florian -- Need help with High Availability? http://www.hastexo.com/now _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
