On Oct 6, 2011, at 5:01 PM, Florian Haas wrote: > On 2011-10-06 22:32, Prakash Velayutham wrote: >> My OCFS2 file system is being used for MySQL database (failover setup) > > What for? A MySQL database clearly does not require OCFS2 for failover > capability. With Pacemaker, MySQL HA needs can be easily met using > either shared storage, or single-Primary DRBD (both with a regular, > non-cluster file system), or, if database uptime is more important than > transaction integrity in the face of fail-over, MySQL replication. None > of which require OCFS2 by any means. > > My suggestion is, do reconsider that setup before you get deeper into > troubleshooting your OCFS2. > > Cheers, > Florian
Any reason why you prefer one over the other? BTW, I can tolerate a downtime of about 5 minutes if that tilts the scale one way or another... Thanks, Prakash _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
