On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Mark Smith <m...@bumptechnologies.com> wrote: >>> I realize this may be a pipe dream. > > Someone here at the office suggested that we use more machines in our > cluster to ensure we always have a quorum, but put -inf location > constraints on those nodes to make sure the resources only live on the > load balancer nodes. > > Is there any obvious flaw to this plan?
Sounds plausible _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
