Since the questions was asked. Is it possible to update those epel (at leasy 5 but both i386 and x86_64) repos with the latest build (3.9.2) of resource-agents? The current state is inconsistent. Some repos have 1.0.1 some 1.0.4
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Andrew Beekhof <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Thomas Guthmann > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On clusterlabs.org, there are 2 repositories epel-5 and epel-6. > > How many nano-seconds has centos-6 been out for? > > > However the > > epel-6 repository [1] is empty. Do you guys plan to use it or should we > > build our own RPMs because it's never going to happen ? > > > > I believe, like many, with (finally) Centos 6 out we would like to start > to > > upgrade our clusters to if possible corosync 1.3.x and Pacemaker 1.1.x > > > > So, can you tell us if el6 RPMs are on the roadmap or not ? And if yes, > an > > approx. date when they could be released. > > I don't believe there is any need for additional RPMs. Pacemaker > should already be in CentOS6 > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: [email protected] > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker > -- Serge Dubrouski.
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: [email protected] http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
