All, I'm seeing a problem referred to in this thread:
crm(live)configure# primitive stonith-ipmi-1 stonith:external/ipmi \ > meta target-role="started" is-managed="true" \ > operations $id="stonith-ipmi-1-operations" \ > op monitor interval="15" timeout="15" on-fail="restart" start-delay="15" \ > op start interval="0" timeout="15" on-fail="restart" \ > params hostname="r1lead2-bmc" ipaddr="172.24.0.10" userid="XXXXX" > passwd="XXXXX" passwd_method="param" interface="lanplus" crm(live)configure# commit crm(live)configure# primitive stonith-ipmi-2 stonith:external/ipmi \ > meta target-role="started" is-managed="true" \ > operations $id="stonith-ipmi-2-operations" \ > op monitor interval="15" timeout="15" on-fail="restart" start-delay="15" \ > op start interval="0" timeout="15" on-fail="restart" \ > params hostname="r1lead1-bmc" ipaddr="172.24.0.7" userid="XXXXX" > passwd="XXXXX" passwd_method="param" interface="lanplus" crm(live)configure# commit WARNING: Resources stonith-ipmi-1,stonith-ipmi-2 violate uniqueness for parameter "passwd": "XXXXX" WARNING: Resources stonith-ipmi-1,stonith-ipmi-2 violate uniqueness for parameter "passwd_method": "param" WARNING: Resources stonith-ipmi-1,stonith-ipmi-2 violate uniqueness for parameter "interface": "lanplus" WARNING: Resources stonith-ipmi-1,stonith-ipmi-2 violate uniqueness for parameter "userid": "XXXXX" Do you still want to commit? yes crm(live)configure# The problem is that I want to perform this operation as "crm < commands", which returns the warnings and assumes a "NO" to the question. I have current Novell updates applied, which includes the cibconfig.py d0472a26eda1 patch. I see no Novell bug for this issue. Have I missed the fix under a different thread? Any suggestions will be appreciated. Thanks. Bob Haxo On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 10:33 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov > <bub...@hoster-ok.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > 29.03.2011 18:33, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 08:41:45AM +0200, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > >>> Oops, this is actually a bug in fence_ipmilan which reports all params > >>> as unique. > >> > >> Well, that's bad, but then we don't want to annoy people until > >> this issue has been resolved. The meta-data stuff usually needs > >> a bit more attention, as far as I could see. I think that we'd > >> need to make this check optional. > > > > I planned to post patch to redhat's bugzilla in nearest days (together > > with bunch of other fixes and features). Should I send it (them) > > somewhere else too? > > Nah, RHBZ should be enough. > > > > >> > >> What's your experience? Does it show these messages only once or > >> all the time? > > > > Only once after resource either defined or changed. > > It also cries something about start and stop operations, do not remember > > now, sorry, short on time right now. > > > > > > Vladislav > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > > Bugs: > > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
