On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 08:30:39PM +0200, Pawel Warowny wrote: > Dnia Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:23:07 +0200 > Dejan Muhamedagic <deja...@fastmail.fm> napisał(a): > > Hi > > Sorry to bother in this thread, but: > > > If you need to do so (there's actually start-delay, but it > > should be deprecated), > > I use start-delay for starting kvm virtualized guest one after another. > If they all start at once and in the background drbd is syncing, the > load is immense. > > How can I achieve this without start-delay?
I think you cannot, not yet. There should be some support for this coming, but I'm not sure about the current plans. In this case the use of start-delay is fine. What I referred to was using it to make sure that the previous resource started. Thanks, Dejan > Best regards > -- > Pawel Warowny > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
