Hi Andrew, >> Is there a difference between? Or is in both cases the score 0? >> order start-order 0: ( A B ) C D ( E F ) >> and >> order start-order : ( A B ) C D ( E F )
>Even if the latter was legal syntax, which I'm pretty sure its >shouldn't be, it would be equivalent to the first form Both syntax work with pacemaker-1.1.5, so someone might "fix" this. > Look up the meaning of score=0 for ordering constraints. I tried the following, but none of them triggered the other resources after starting start_trigger: order start-order1 inf: start_trigger ( A B ) C D ( E F ) order start-order1 -inf: start_trigger ( A B ) C D ( E F ) order start-order1 +inf: start_trigger ( A B ) C D ( E F ) Would you be so kind to give me the final hint? I think I did it the same way as mentioned in the documentation "Example 6.12", but it seems not to work for me. Cheers, Ulf -- Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
