On 7/22/64 2:59 PM, Pavel Levshin wrote:
01.04.2011 18:36, Ron Kerry:
> Folks -
>
> Consider a running cluster with all resources managed. We want to stop
> and quickly restart a particular resource without impacting other
> resources. The software stack running on the system can deal with this
> sort of temporary outage. We perform the following actions:
> * unmanage the resource
> * stop the resource
> * start the resource
> * manage the resource
>
> The above procedure is sometimes successful. However, we will also
> sometimes get a resource monitor failure after stopping the resource.
> It is clear that the monitor operation was not stopped (at least not
> immediately) by unmanaging the resource.
Unmanaged resource cannot be started and stopped, but can still be
monitored.
So unmanaged really means the resource is still being managed to some degree?
This does not seem desirable behavior. An unmanaged resource should be exactly that ... completely
unmanaged ==> It cannot be stopped, started OR monitored.
--
Ron Kerry rke...@sgi.com
Global Product Support - SGI Federal
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
