On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff <mi...@clusterbau.com > wrote:
> On Thursday 25 November 2010 08:56:21 Marko Potocnik wrote: > (...) > > The order constraint does not affect the IP migration strategy in case of > > service failure. I agree that I missed it, but I does not affect the > > current behavior of IP resource in case of service failure. > > > Perhaps it is better if you describe what you want to acchieve so we could > help with the solution: > > - You want to have a service running on two nodes so tha failover happens > faster. > > - In case of one failure of the service on one node you want the IP address > to > move to the other node. > > Is that all? > Pretty much, service which failed should also be restarted, so that fail-back is possible. And that is all :) > > -- > Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff > Guardinistr. 63 > 81375 München > > Tel: (0163) 172 50 98 > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker > >
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
