>You're not making sense, first you say MySQL Master-Master, then you >mention master mysqld on clusterB and slave mysqld on clusterA. So, >which one is it: Yes, it is true. If I stop openais and I start mysql without openais the config is M-M (or Multi-Master).
When pacemaker starts mysql processes I can see master and slave mysqld text from crm_mon. >- MySQL Master-Master (or Multi-Master) which can be achieved via MySQL >Replication >- MySQL Master-Slave, which can be achieved via MySQL Replication as well I'd like to implement the above. I don't know which one is right for me. Because of M-M MySQL config I think the 1st one is my choice. >- MySQL Master with a DRBD backend (even MySQL docs recommend this type >of setup for some use cases) in which the MySQL instance runs only where >DRBD is primary I think I know this setup and don't want it now. >- MySQL Cluster (nothing to do with Pacemaker, although they can be put >together in a setup) This would be the next test if I have enough time. TIA, Ruzsi _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
