On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Pavlos Parissis <pavlos.paris...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 29 October 2010 11:47, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: > [...snip..] >>>> There wont be unfortunately. >>>> Some of the changes we needed to make involved the use of >>>> g_hash_table_get_values() which only appeared in glib 2.14 >>>> So EPEL5 is stuck on the 1.0 series. >>> >>> Does that mean I shouldn't use 1.1.x (x<4) on EPEL? I guess not since >>> the change you mentioned is only in 1.1.4 >>> I currently use 1.1.3 on EPEL 5.4 >> >> 1.1.3 is generally ok still, it was mostly performance stuff that went into >> .4 >> You could update glib manually and rebuild the 1.1.4 packages though... > > I wont go down this path. So, for EPEL 1.1.3 is the last available > release without any upgrade paths,
to be fair, there is an upgrade path, it just involves a version of glib2 that was released less than 4 years ago > that's not very nice for production > systems. I consider switching back to 1.0.9, which hopefully gets > updated. 1.0.10 is almost done _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
