On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic <deja...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:59:50AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] <r.bha...@ipax.at> >> wrote: >> > On 09/23/2010 09:28 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >> The good news is that 1.1.3 doesn't have that behavior. >> >> Lets see how 1.0 goes once all the relevant patches have been backported. >> > >> > thanks for your answer! will those patches make it into 1.0.10 or >> > do you have another eta for this? >> >> MORI-san from NTT is currently working on the backports. >> we'll delay .10 until he has a chance to complete the process :-) > > Do you know if that includes the crm shell?
He was going to ask you about a few shell commits that looked relevant. You normally backport the ones you think are relevant though, so I wanted him to ask you about them first. _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
