On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Brandon DeYoung <brandon.deyo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Clusterlabs mailing list, > > Some of my co-workers are frustrated with ricci and luci. Hence, I am on a > Quixotic quest for something "better". > > I'm following the Pacemaker Cluster from Scratch guide. > > In the example setup of a 2-node cluster quoration is ignored with this > config: > > crm configure property no-quorum-policy="ignore" > > In RHCS i got accustomed to using a quorum disk in a 2-node cluster. I've > searched, but have been unable to find any reference to something similar in > pacemaker. Is this something that is planned or is the value of this > approach dubious? > > Thanks for any and all thoughts on this!
>From what I hear, qdisk is definitely over-used. In the world of pacemaker, we don't rely on quorum to the extent that other resource managers do - so we have no real need to fake having it. In your situation fencing[1] + no-quorum-policy="ignore" should normally be sufficient. Or add a third with standby=true set (prevents it from hosting resources) to act as a tie-breaker. [1] Be sure to read http://ourobengr.com/ha _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
