On 8/27/2010 at 03:37 PM, Michael Smith <msm...@cbnco.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, Tim Serong wrote:
>
> > > for now I have stonith-enabled="false" in
> > > my CIB. Is there a way to make clvmd/dlm respect it?
> >
> > No. At least, I don't think so, and/or I hope not :)
>
> I think I'd consider it a bug: I've disabled stonith, so dlm shouldn't
> wait forever for a fence operation that isn't going to happen.
>
> CLVM is just making the metadata cluster-aware, so the only way I can
> imagine screwing things up without fencing would be if I ran something
> like lvresize on two nodes at the same time, during a split brain.
So I dug around a little:
# dlm_controld.pcmk -h
Usage:
dlm_controld [options]
Options:
...
-f <num> Enable (1) or disable (0) fencing recovery dependency
Default is 1
-q <num> Enable (1) or disable (0) quorum recovery dependency
Default is 0
I reckon if you set the args parameter of your ocf:pacemaker:controld
resource to "-f 0 -q 0", you'll have DLM ignoring fencing. At this
point (lest someone reading the archives later thinks I am advocating
this) it would be irresponsible of me not to mention this story about
Why You Need STONITH:
http://advogato.org/person/lmb/diary/105.html
There is also an accompanying comic:
http://ourobengr.com/stonith-story
If DLM is ignoring fencing, everything that uses DLM is also going to
ignore fencing, so if you've got (say) an OCFS2 filesystem on top of
your CLVM volume, your filesystem will potentially be toast in a
split-brain situation.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Serong <tser...@novell.com>
Senior Clustering Engineer, OPS Engineering, Novell Inc.
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
