On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:13:45PM +0200, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:01:08AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > > # because its friday, I'll give you some irrelevant input, > > > # doing it all in one pipe. feel free to ignore ;-) > > > > > > eval $( > > > printf "Garbage ignored\nCPU Type: speedy\nCPU Speed: gonzales\nNumber Of > > > Cores: you won't guess\nOther information: ignored\n" | > > > sed -n -e " > > > s/^CPU Type: /cpu_type=/ > > > s/^CPU Speed: /cpu_speed=/ > > > s/^Number Of.*: /cpu_cores=/ > > > t shell_escape_and_print > > > b > > > : shell_escape_and_print > > > s/'/'\\\\''/g > > > s/=/='/ > > > s/\$/'/ > > > p > > > " > > > ) > > > echo "$cpu_type" > > > echo "$cpu_speed" > > > echo "$cpu_cores" > > > > Can it be simplified slightly like this? > > - t shell_escape_and_print > - b > - : shell_escape_and_print > + T > > Where t, b, :, are all in "original sed", > and T is a "GNU sed specific addition".
That I didn't know :-) > Well, yes, sure it can. > But this all started in the name of "portability" (on a shell level). > > Wether or not it is sensible to argue about shell level portability, > or sed script level portability, or the availability of GNU tools > well... leave that to some other day. I vote for your original, more portable option. _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
