Hi, On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 06:20:10AM -0400, Vadym Chepkov wrote: > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 5:05 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic <deja...@fastmail.fm>wrote: > > > Too late for that, we shouldn't change semantics. I did think > > about it at the time and say "resource manage rsc" seemed > > unequivocal. BTW, there's a way to remove a meta attribute: > > > > crm resource meta <rsc> delete <attr> > > > > Thanks, > > > > Dejan > > > > > I know, that's how I clean it later. But it becomes somewhat a tedious task. > we already have to remember "unmove" resources, in addition we have to > "unstop" and "demanage" :)
crm resource meta <rsc> delete is-managed crm resource manage <rsc> default (or similar) Is there such a big difference? > It's not a life stopper, it's inconvenience. crm shell was introduced to > make pacemaker more convenient, right? Right :) I hope it does. Thanks, Dejan > Vadym > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
