On May 13, 2010, at 1:37 PM, Ivan Coronado wrote:

> Hello to everybody,
>  
> I have a problem with the corosync.conf setup. I have a drbd service runing 
> on eth3, and a general network and the stonith device (idrac6) in the eth0. 
> If I unplug the eth3 to simulate a network failure two nodes are fenced 
> (first the slave followed by the master). If I only leave ringnumber 0 in the 
> coroync.conf file I don't have this problem. Is this normal operation?
>  
> Here you have the section of corosync.conf where I have the problem, and 
> thanks for the help.
>  
>         rrp_mode: active
>         interface {
>                 # eth0
>                 ringnumber: 0
>                 bindnetaddr: 200.200.201.0
>                 mcastaddr: 226.94.1.1
>                 mcastport: 5405
>         }
>         interface {
>                 #eth3
>                 ringnumber: 1
>                 bindnetaddr: 192.168.2.0
>                 mcastaddr: 226.94.1.2
>                 mcastport: 5406
>         }
> -----
> Ivan


I read in the list open...@lists.osdl.org setting ports at least two apart 
helps (5405, 5407)

Vadym

_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf

Reply via email to